Join the Rapoport Center for a back-to-school mixer. Meet classmates\, faculty\, and staff from across campus working on human rights and justice\, and learn more about ways you can be involved in the Center’s projects on human rights\, peace\, environmental justice\, reproductive justice\, and more!
If you need an accommodation to participate in this event, please contact the event sponsor or the Texas Law Special Events Office at specialevents@law.utexas.edu no later than seven business days prior to the event. X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:Join the Rapoport Center for a back-to-school mixer. Meet classmates\, faculty\, and staff from across campus working on human rights and justice\, and learn more about ways you can be involved in the Center’s projects on human rights\, peace\, environmental justice\, reproductive justice\, and more!
If you need an accommodation to participate in this event, please contact the event sponsor or the Texas Law Special Events Office at specialevents@law.utexas.edu no later than seven business days prior to the event.
LOCATION:TNH 2.111 - Sheffield-Massey Room URL:https://law.utexas.edu/calendar/2026/08/27/89317/ CLASS:PUBLIC STATUS:CONFIRMED END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;VALUE=DATE-TIME;TZID=US/Central:20260910T160000 DTEND;VALUE=DATE-TIME;TZID=US/Central:20260910T160000 DTSTAMP:20260827T105800Z CREATED:20260728T171800Z LAST-MODIFIED:20260821T124100Z UID:20260910T160000-89037@law.utexas.edu SUMMARY:Anna Law: “When Did U.S. Migration DESCRIPTION:In the Supreme Court’s recent Trump v Barbara opinion on birthright citizenship\, Justice Alito’s asserted in his dissent that before and soon after the Civil War “immigration was unrestricted\, so aliens could come and stay as long as they wanted.” Historical evidence does not confirm his claim. Though there were few federal laws in that period\, a phalanx of state-level laws restricted the international and interstate migration of free and enslaved Black people and indigent migrants. Professor Anna Law\, a scholar of US immigration and constitutional history\, is the author of a timely new book that addresses these subjects.
If you need an accommodation to participate in this event, please contact the event sponsor or the Texas Law Special Events Office at specialevents@law.utexas.edu no later than seven business days prior to the event. X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:In the Supreme Court’s recent Trump v Barbara opinion on birthright citizenship\, Justice Alito’s asserted in his dissent that before and soon after the Civil War “immigration was unrestricted\, so aliens could come and stay as long as they wanted.” Historical evidence does not confirm his claim. Though there were few federal laws in that period\, a phalanx of state-level laws restricted the international and interstate migration of free and enslaved Black people and indigent migrants. Professor Anna Law\, a scholar of US immigration and constitutional history\, is the author of a timely new book that addresses these subjects.
If you need an accommodation to participate in this event, please contact the event sponsor or the Texas Law Special Events Office at specialevents@law.utexas.edu no later than seven business days prior to the event.
LOCATION:TNH 2.111 - Sheffield-Massey Room URL:https://law.utexas.edu/calendar/2026/09/10/89037/ CLASS:PUBLIC STATUS:CONFIRMED END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;VALUE=DATE-TIME;TZID=US/Central:20260914T160000 DTEND;VALUE=DATE-TIME;TZID=US/Central:20260914T160000 DTSTAMP:20260827T105800Z CREATED:20260804T084600Z LAST-MODIFIED:20260824T083900Z UID:20260914T160000-89197@law.utexas.edu SUMMARY:Rapoport Center: Karen Engle and DESCRIPTION:Since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade\, Texas has been home to one of the harshest criminal abortion bans in the country. Yet\, there have been virtually no prosecutions under the ban\, due in part to the territorial limits of state law\, constraints on accomplice liability\, and a legislative commitment not to prosecute pregnant persons for their abortions. This talk will consider the coordinated legal strategy of lawyers and advocates in Texas to use local government ordinances and civil litigation as sites for criminal law claiming\, if not criminal lawmaking.
If you need an accommodation to participate in this event, please contact the event sponsor or the Texas Law Special Events Office at specialevents@law.utexas.edu no later than seven business days prior to the event. X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:Since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade\, Texas has been home to one of the harshest criminal abortion bans in the country. Yet\, there have been virtually no prosecutions under the ban\, due in part to the territorial limits of state law\, constraints on accomplice liability\, and a legislative commitment not to prosecute pregnant persons for their abortions. This talk will consider the coordinated legal strategy of lawyers and advocates in Texas to use local government ordinances and civil litigation as sites for criminal law claiming\, if not criminal lawmaking.
If you need an accommodation to participate in this event, please contact the event sponsor or the Texas Law Special Events Office at specialevents@law.utexas.edu no later than seven business days prior to the event.
LOCATION:TNH 2.111 - Sheffield-Massey Room URL:https://law.utexas.edu/calendar/2026/09/14/89197/ CLASS:PUBLIC STATUS:CONFIRMED END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;VALUE=DATE-TIME;TZID=US/Central:20261005T160000 DTEND;VALUE=DATE-TIME;TZID=US/Central:20261005T160000 DTSTAMP:20260827T105800Z CREATED:20260804T084800Z LAST-MODIFIED:20260821T124600Z UID:20261005T160000-89217@law.utexas.edu SUMMARY:Rapoport Center: Valeria Gomez DESCRIPTION:In the wake of the Supreme Court's decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization\, the United States possesses a fragmented patchwork of state laws imposing varying degrees of restrictions on and penalties for abortion. This talk will examine the profound implications of this arrangement for noncitizen women\, whose rights and mobility are already constrained by federal immigration laws and policies. It will argue that the intersection of state-level abortion restrictions and federal immigration enforcement creates de facto internal borders\, uniquely curtailing the reproductive freedoms of noncitizens.
If you need an accommodation to participate in this event, please contact the event sponsor or the Texas Law Special Events Office at specialevents@law.utexas.edu no later than seven business days prior to the event. X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:In the wake of the Supreme Court's decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization\, the United States possesses a fragmented patchwork of state laws imposing varying degrees of restrictions on and penalties for abortion. This talk will examine the profound implications of this arrangement for noncitizen women\, whose rights and mobility are already constrained by federal immigration laws and policies. It will argue that the intersection of state-level abortion restrictions and federal immigration enforcement creates de facto internal borders\, uniquely curtailing the reproductive freedoms of noncitizens.
If you need an accommodation to participate in this event, please contact the event sponsor or the Texas Law Special Events Office at specialevents@law.utexas.edu no later than seven business days prior to the event.
LOCATION:TNH 2.111 - Sheffield-Massey Room URL:https://law.utexas.edu/calendar/2026/10/05/89217/ CLASS:PUBLIC STATUS:CONFIRMED END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;VALUE=DATE-TIME;TZID=US/Central:20261019T160000 DTEND;VALUE=DATE-TIME;TZID=US/Central:20261019T160000 DTSTAMP:20260827T105800Z CREATED:20260804T085000Z LAST-MODIFIED:20260821T124600Z UID:20261019T160000-89198@law.utexas.edu SUMMARY:Rapoport Center: Valena Beety DESCRIPTION:Faulty forensic evidence and biased evidence relying on sex-based stereotypes have long been used to convict innocent women in situations where an accident or health event has been misconstrued as a criminal act. This talk will conceptualize and consider “reproductive wrongful convictions\,” which are instances in which a noncriminal pregnancy-related event or act––such as a miscarriage\, stillbirth\, or taking legally prescribed medicine––is erroneously labeled as criminal. It will also attend to the ways that women with disabilities and from racially and economically subordinated communities are often labeled as “unfit” and made particularly vulnerable to these charges.
If you need an accommodation to participate in this event, please contact the event sponsor or the Texas Law Special Events Office at specialevents@law.utexas.edu no later than seven business days prior to the event. X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:Faulty forensic evidence and biased evidence relying on sex-based stereotypes have long been used to convict innocent women in situations where an accident or health event has been misconstrued as a criminal act. This talk will conceptualize and consider “reproductive wrongful convictions\,” which are instances in which a noncriminal pregnancy-related event or act––such as a miscarriage\, stillbirth\, or taking legally prescribed medicine––is erroneously labeled as criminal. It will also attend to the ways that women with disabilities and from racially and economically subordinated communities are often labeled as “unfit” and made particularly vulnerable to these charges.
If you need an accommodation to participate in this event, please contact the event sponsor or the Texas Law Special Events Office at specialevents@law.utexas.edu no later than seven business days prior to the event.
LOCATION:TNH 2.111 - Sheffield-Massey Room URL:https://law.utexas.edu/calendar/2026/10/19/89198/ CLASS:PUBLIC STATUS:CONFIRMED END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;VALUE=DATE-TIME;TZID=US/Central:20261102T160000 DTEND;VALUE=DATE-TIME;TZID=US/Central:20261102T160000 DTSTAMP:20260827T105800Z CREATED:20260804T085200Z LAST-MODIFIED:20260821T124400Z UID:20261102T160000-89199@law.utexas.edu SUMMARY:Rapoport Center: Michele Goodwin DESCRIPTION:Using the example of post-Dobbs abortion bans that contain no exceptions for incest or rape\, this talk will argue that law and institutions charged with protecting the vulnerable are often responsible for the oppression of women\, the suppression of their capacities\, and the harms that follow. It will examine some of the ways that the state wields and perpetuates sexual violence inconsistently based on race and class\, as it curates prurient and avoidable harm against women and girls\, fails to shield them from harm\, and too frequently magnifies both risks of this harm and the harm itself.
If you need an accommodation to participate in this event, please contact the event sponsor or the Texas Law Special Events Office at specialevents@law.utexas.edu no later than seven business days prior to the event. X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:Using the example of post-Dobbs abortion bans that contain no exceptions for incest or rape\, this talk will argue that law and institutions charged with protecting the vulnerable are often responsible for the oppression of women\, the suppression of their capacities\, and the harms that follow. It will examine some of the ways that the state wields and perpetuates sexual violence inconsistently based on race and class\, as it curates prurient and avoidable harm against women and girls\, fails to shield them from harm\, and too frequently magnifies both risks of this harm and the harm itself.
If you need an accommodation to participate in this event, please contact the event sponsor or the Texas Law Special Events Office at specialevents@law.utexas.edu no later than seven business days prior to the event.
LOCATION:TNH 2.111 - Sheffield-Massey Room URL:https://law.utexas.edu/calendar/2026/11/02/89199/ CLASS:PUBLIC STATUS:CONFIRMED END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;VALUE=DATE-TIME;TZID=US/Central:20261116T160000 DTEND;VALUE=DATE-TIME;TZID=US/Central:20261116T160000 DTSTAMP:20260827T105800Z CREATED:20260804T085300Z LAST-MODIFIED:20260821T124500Z UID:20261116T160000-89200@law.utexas.edu SUMMARY:Rapoport Center: Agustina Ramón Michel DESCRIPTION:Healthcare conscientious objection allows providers to refuse treatment based on moral or religious beliefs. Alongside the legalization of abortion since the 1970s\, conscience clauses have expanded globally. In response\, some legislative bodies and courts have implemented institutional safeguards to ensure that conscience-based refusals do not become insurmountable obstacles for patients. This talk will argue that while these institutional safeguards hold potential\, they have not fundamentally altered the dominant understanding of medical objection\, which frames the conflict and its resolution as a situation involving two equally balanced parties.
If you need an accommodation to participate in this event, please contact the event sponsor or the Texas Law Special Events Office at specialevents@law.utexas.edu no later than seven business days prior to the event. X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:Healthcare conscientious objection allows providers to refuse treatment based on moral or religious beliefs. Alongside the legalization of abortion since the 1970s\, conscience clauses have expanded globally. In response\, some legislative bodies and courts have implemented institutional safeguards to ensure that conscience-based refusals do not become insurmountable obstacles for patients. This talk will argue that while these institutional safeguards hold potential\, they have not fundamentally altered the dominant understanding of medical objection\, which frames the conflict and its resolution as a situation involving two equally balanced parties.
If you need an accommodation to participate in this event, please contact the event sponsor or the Texas Law Special Events Office at specialevents@law.utexas.edu no later than seven business days prior to the event.
LOCATION:TNH 2.111 - Sheffield-Massey Room URL:https://law.utexas.edu/calendar/2026/11/16/89200/ CLASS:PUBLIC STATUS:CONFIRMED END:VEVENT END:VCALENDAR