BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SCHOOL OF LAW//NONSGML Events Calendar v1.0//EN
X-WR-TIMEZONE:America/Chicago
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:US/Central
X-LIC-LOCATION:America/Chicago
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0600
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:CDT
DTSTART:19700308T020000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=3;BYDAY=2SU
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0600
TZNAME:CST
DTSTART:19701101T020000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=11;BYDAY=1SU
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=US/Central:20230126T120000
DTEND;VALUE=DATE-TIME;TZID=US/Central:20230126T130000

DTSTAMP:20260502T123600Z
CREATED:20221104T150400Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20221104T150400Z
UID:20230126T120000-71645@law.utexas.edu
SUMMARY:Vincent Phillip Muñoz (Notre Dame)
DESCRIPTION:<p>Does religious liberty mean religious citizens need not follow otherwise valid laws?</p>
  <p>In his public lecture, University of Notre Dame Professor Vincent Phillip Muñoz – whose scholarship has been cited in multiple Supreme Court opinions, including by Justice Alito in Fulton and by Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Thomas in Espinoza v. Montana (2020) – will address this question and others, advancing his controversial and counter-intuitive thesis that the Founders’ understanding of religious liberty does not include a right to religious exemptions. Drawing on his new book, "Religious Liberty and the American Founding", Professor Muñoz will argue that Justice Scalia was (mostly) right and, accordingly, Justice Alito’s call for overturning Smith is mistaken, at least if the Founding Fathers are to guide First Amendment religious liberty jurisprudence.</p>
  <p>Lunch will be offered (please RSVP). For the RSVP form and more information about this event, please visit the link.</p>
  <p>This event is co-sponsored by the Civitas Institute.</p>\n\nIf you need an accommodation to participate in this event, please contact the event sponsor or the Texas Law Special Events Office at specialevents@law.utexas.edu no later than seven business days prior to the event.
X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:<p>Does religious liberty mean religious citizens need not follow otherwise valid laws?</p>
  <p>In his public lecture, University of Notre Dame Professor Vincent Phillip Muñoz – whose scholarship has been cited in multiple Supreme Court opinions, including by Justice Alito in Fulton and by Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Thomas in Espinoza v. Montana (2020) – will address this question and others, advancing his controversial and counter-intuitive thesis that the Founders’ understanding of religious liberty does not include a right to religious exemptions. Drawing on his new book, "Religious Liberty and the American Founding", Professor Muñoz will argue that Justice Scalia was (mostly) right and, accordingly, Justice Alito’s call for overturning Smith is mistaken, at least if the Founding Fathers are to guide First Amendment religious liberty jurisprudence.</p>
  <p>Lunch will be offered (please RSVP). For the RSVP form and more information about this event, please visit the link.</p>
  <p>This event is co-sponsored by the Civitas Institute.</p><p>If you need an accommodation to participate in this event, please contact the event
                                          event sponsor or the Texas Law Special Events Office at <a href="mailto:specialevents@law.utexas.edu">specialevents@law.utexas.edu</a> no later than seven business days prior to the event.</p>
CATEGORIES:Panel Discussion / Speaker Series
LOCATION:TNH 2.114 - Francis Auditorium
URL:http://law.utexas.edu/calendar/2023/01/26/71645/
CLASS:PUBLIC
STATUS:CONFIRMED

END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR