BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SCHOOL OF LAW//NONSGML Events Calendar v1.0//EN
X-WR-TIMEZONE:America/Chicago
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:US/Central
X-LIC-LOCATION:America/Chicago
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0600
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:CDT
DTSTART:19700308T020000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=3;BYDAY=2SU
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0600
TZNAME:CST
DTSTART:19701101T020000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=11;BYDAY=1SU
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=US/Central:20250121T154500
DTEND;VALUE=DATE-TIME;TZID=US/Central:20250121T173000

DTSTAMP:20260418T112500Z
CREATED:20250115T222800Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250115T222800Z
UID:20250121T154500-80739@law.utexas.edu
SUMMARY:Business Law Workshop - Jonathon Zytnick
DESCRIPTION:<p>Jonathon Zytnick presenting an original paper in the Business Law Seminar.</p>
  <p>Abstract
  Although mutual funds have distinctive voting patterns, little is known about whether their votes reflect their underlying investors’ preferences. I use novel proprietary data on individual shareholder voting and fund ownership to compare the voting preferences of individual investors to those of their funds. Fund votes have no relation to the votes of their underlying customers, with the sole exception of sorting by ideological individuals into small, like-minded ESG funds. Limited attention provides some explanation for the minimal ideological sorting: investors choose investments, both equities and funds, based on the investments’ blunt ideological features but not on subtle features.
  </p>\n\nIf you need an accommodation to participate in this event, please contact the event sponsor or the Texas Law Special Events Office at specialevents@law.utexas.edu no later than seven business days prior to the event. Speaker: Jonathon Zytnick, P, Georgetown
X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:<p>Jonathon Zytnick presenting an original paper in the Business Law Seminar.</p>
  <p>Abstract
  Although mutual funds have distinctive voting patterns, little is known about whether their votes reflect their underlying investors’ preferences. I use novel proprietary data on individual shareholder voting and fund ownership to compare the voting preferences of individual investors to those of their funds. Fund votes have no relation to the votes of their underlying customers, with the sole exception of sorting by ideological individuals into small, like-minded ESG funds. Limited attention provides some explanation for the minimal ideological sorting: investors choose investments, both equities and funds, based on the investments’ blunt ideological features but not on subtle features.
  </p><p>If you need an accommodation to participate in this event, please contact the event
                                          event sponsor or the Texas Law Special Events Office at <a href="mailto:specialevents@law.utexas.edu">specialevents@law.utexas.edu</a> no later than seven business days prior to the event.</p> Speaker: Jonathon Zytnick, P, Georgetown

LOCATION:TNH 3.124 - Neathery Classroom
URL:http://law.utexas.edu/calendar/2025/01/21/80739/
CLASS:PUBLIC
STATUS:CONFIRMED

END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR