UTexas.edu

Resources for:

Sign In
The University of Texas at Austin School of Law

Contribution

The Role of Constitutional Facts and Social Science Research in Capital Litigation: Is "Proof" of Arbitrariness or Inaccuracy Relevant to the Constitutional Regulation of the American Death Penalty?

Authors:

Jordan M Steiker

in The Future of the American Death Penalty: An Agenda for the Next Generation of Capital Punishment Research 23

Full Citation

Jordan M. Steiker, The Role of Constitutional Facts and Social Science Research in Capital Litigation: Is "Proof" of Arbitrariness or Inaccuracy Relevant to the Constitutional Regulation of the American Death Penalty?, in THE FUTURE OF THE AMERICAN DEATH PENALTY: AN AGENDA FOR THE NEXT GENERATION OF CAPITAL PUNISHMENT RESEARCH 23 (Charles S. Lanier, William J. Bowers, & James R. Acker; Durham: Carolina Academic Press, 2009)