-
March 28, 2020
Scott v. Georgia, No. 16-523 (cert.-stage reply filed February 28, 2017)
Question Presented: Is a Georgia statute, which forbids communicating otherwise-protected sexually related speech to minors with the intent to arouse or satisfy someone’s sexual desire, facially invalid under the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment? -
March 28, 2020
Question Presented: Whether “service advisors” at car dealerships are exempt under 29 U.S.C. §213(b)(10)(A) from the Fair Labor Standards Act’s overtime-pay requirements. -
March 28, 2020
Questions Presented: (1) Does the Federal Tort Claims Act allow children of active-duty mothers to bring birth-injury claims against the federal government as the Fourth, Eighth, and Eleventh Circuits have held, or should the Feres v. United States, 340 U.S. 135 (1950) doctrine be expanded to bar a child’s birth-injury claim when government negligence injures […] -
March 28, 2020
Question Presented: Does a borrower exercise his right to rescind a transaction in satisfaction of the requirements of 15 U.S.C. § 1635 by “notifying the creditor” in writing within three years of the consummation of the transaction, or must a borrower file a lawsuit within three years of the consummation of the transaction? -
March 28, 2020
Question Presented: (1) Are disparate-impact claims cognizable under the Fair Housing Act § 804(a)? (2) Should this Court establish a methodology for assessing disparate-impact claims under FHA §804(a) when petitioners make no claim that this case would come out differently under any of the tests employed by courts of appeals and, in any event, Housing and […] -
March 28, 2020
Rojas-Pérez v. Holder, No. 13-174 (cert. petition filed August 5, 2013)
Question Presented: Is the Board of Immigration Appeals’ interpretation of “a particular social group” as requiring an element of “social visibility” entitled to deference under Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837 (1984), as held by seven circuits, or is the requirement an arbitrary or impermissible interpretation of the statute, […] -
March 28, 2020
Question Presented: Whether the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment prohibits the State of California from defining marriage as the union of a man and a woman. -
March 28, 2020
Question Presented: Whether a law enforcement officer may obtain a nonconsensual and warrantless blood sample from a drunk driver under the exigent circumstances exception to the Fourth Amendment warrant requirement based upon the natural dissipation of alcohol in the bloodstream. -
March 28, 2020
Lozman v. City of Riviera Beach, No. 11-626 (merits brief for respondent filed July 12, 2012)
Question Presented: Whether a floating structure that is indefinitely moored, receives power and other utilities from shore, and is not intended to be used in maritime transportation or commerce constitutes a “vessel” under 1 U.S.C. § 3, thus triggering federal maritime jurisdiction. -
March 28, 2020
Henderson v. United States, No. 11-9307 (cert. petition filed February 23, 2012)
Question Presented: When the governing law is unsettled at the time of trial but settled in the defendant’s favor by the time of appeal, should an appellate court reviewing for “plain error” apply Johnson v. United States, 520 U.S. 461 (1997)’s time-of-appeal standard, as the First, Second, Sixth, Tenth, and Eleventh Circuits do, or should […]
