-
May 5, 2026
Supreme Court Litigation Clinic Files Amicus Brief on Behalf of Penn & Teller
The Supreme Court Clinic wrote an amicus brief on help Penn & Teller argue against what they call junk science in an investigation. -
June 13, 2022
Recent Graduates Receive Texas Law’s 2022 CLEA Outstanding Clinical Student Award
Recent Graduates Receive Texas Law’s 2022 CLEA Outstanding Clinical Student Award -
December 10, 2021
Students, Faculty, and Alumni Work Together on Supreme Court Capital-Punishment and Religious-Liberty Case -
March 28, 2020
Question Presented: Whether the federal criminal prohibition against encouraging or inducing illegal immigration for commercial advantage or private financial gain, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(A)(iv) and (B)(i), is facially unconstitutional. -
March 28, 2020
Question Presented: Whether the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 Section 4072’s provision of “exclusive” federal jurisdiction applies to suits against private insurers. -
March 28, 2020
Question Presented: Should “applicable” and “not inconsistent” in the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act be interpreted according to their ordinary meanings, such that California’s Labor Code, which is both “relevant, suitable, and fit” and not “incompatible” with the Fair Labor Standards Act, applies to employee compensation for drilling activities on the Outer Continental Shelf? -
March 28, 2020
Ogle v. Texas, No. 18-1182 (cert. petition filed March 8, 2019)
Question Presented: Does a statute criminalizing speech that is both in-tended and reasonably likely to annoy, alarm, or embarrass another person prohibit a substantial amount of protected speech in relation to the statute’s legitimate sweep, thus violating the First Amendment? -
March 28, 2020
Citgo v. Frescati, No. 18-565 (amicus brief supporting certiorari filed November 30, 2018)
Question Presented: Whether under federal maritime law a safe berth clause in a voyage charter contract is a guarantee of a ship’s safety, as the Third Circuit below and the Second Circuit have held, or a duty of due diligence, as the Fifth Circuit has held. -
March 28, 2020
Question Presented: In Hartman v. Moore, 547 U.S. 250 (2006), the Court held that probable cause defeats a First Amendment retaliatory-prosecution claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 as a matter of law. Does probable cause likewise defeat a First Amendment retaliatory-arrest claim under § 1983? -
March 28, 2020
Villegas-Sarabia v. Sessions, No. 17-1559 (cert. petition filed on May 14, 2018)
Question Presented: For purposes of the Immigration and Nationality Act, is misprision of a felony categorically a crime involving moral turpitude?
