Parker Drilling Mgmt. Servs., Ltd. v. Newton, No. 18-389 (merits brief for respondent filed March 22, 2019)

Question Presented: Should “applicable” and “not inconsistent” in the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act be interpreted according to their ordinary meanings, such that California’s Labor Code, which is both “relevant, suitable, and fit” and not “incompatible” with the Fair Labor Standards Act, applies to employee compensation for drilling activities on the Outer Continental Shelf?

Category: Cases and Projects
Tags: ,