Kevin Frazier in the Media

The National Law Review January 5, 2026

85 Predictions for AI and the Law in 2026

AI Innovation and Law Fellow Kevin Frazier responds to a survey asking respondents to assess how AI is expected to shape the profession in the year ahead. Frazier predicts a flood of state AI bills that create laws with different definitions, standards, and mandates and that prompt federal action.

The Fulcrum January 2, 2026

Blame AI or Build With AI? Only One Approach Creates Jobs

AI Innovation and Law Fellow Kevin Frazier pens an opinion piece suggesting that, instead of blaming AI for job loss, focus should be placed on building new educational institutions, retraining and upskilling programs, and new firms.

The Regulatory Review December 29, 2025

Top Contributor Essays of 2025

The Regulatory Review includes an essay from Innovation and Law Fellow Kevin Frazier, “Extraterritorial Limits on States as Laboratories of AI Policy,” published on August 25, as one of the publication’s most-read pieces of 2025.  

Washington Examiner December 21, 2025

AI leaders suggest ‘optional’ work on horizon: Why it might just be a pipe dream

AI Innovation and Law Fellow Kevin Frazier points out that gaps exist in the premise that AI-powered robotics could eventually perform human tasks on a mass scale.

Washington Examiner December 20, 2025

The age of AI is here – how should it be regulated?

AI Innovation and Law Fellow Kevin Frazier, in a story on the regulation of artificial intelligence, points out the drawback of having 50 different regulatory battles happening at the state levels.

KXAN December 20, 2025

Youth camp leaders say new safety law puts them as risk of closure

AI Innovation and Law Fellow Kevin Frazier explains that the Texas Responsible Artificial Intelligence Governance Act's reference to regulating the government's use of AI is explicitly included in a recent executive order, designating it as the proper domain of states.

Daily Caller December 19, 2025

Trump AI Executive Order Protects Americans From Tower Of Babel Approach

AI Innovation and Law Fellow Kevin Frazier authors a piece exploring the question of what entities will be responsible for writing the rules for AI development at the national and state levels.  

The Fulcrum December 19, 2025

Beware of Panic Policies

AI Innovation and Law Fellow Kevin Frazier shares an opinion piece stating that proposals forged by panic tend not to reflect good public policy, and how that concept applies in the world of artificial intelligence.

The Dallas Morning News December 18, 2025

AI governance belongs to Congress, not the states

In an opinion piece, AI Innovation and Law Fellow Kevin Frazier explains why governance belongs to Congress, which should reassert its constitutional role, rather than allowing states to set policy.

Governing December 16, 2025

States Plan to Continue Regulating AI, Despite Trump’s Order

Following a presidential executive order targeting state AI laws, AI Innovation and Law Fellow Kevin Frazier points out that because companies don’t have the resources to tailor their products to every state, regulations affecting how companies train, evaluate, and deploy their AI models essentially set the bar for the entire country.

Tech Policy December 12, 2025

Following Trump Executive Order on AI Congress Must Act

AI Innovation and Law Fellow Kevin Frazier pens a perspective that stresses the need for Congress to act following an executive order ensuring that the federal government takes the lead on AI policy. Frazier suggests action be based on three principles: experimentation, adoption, and information sharing.

The Regulatory Review December 12, 2025

How Congress Can Rescue AI Innovation from a 50-State Maze

AI Innovation and Law Fellow Kevin Frazier encourages Congress to use trial-and-error regulatory sandboxes to guide responsible, evidence-based AI development and prevent conflicting state AI regulation from stifling innovation.