Sanford V Levinson in the Media

Sanford V Levinson’s faculty profile

External link Nation media logo

The Nation June 13, 2025

If an Authoritarian Trump Seizes More Power, Should Blue States Secede?

Professor Sanford Levinson argues that, from a legal perspective, the peaceful secession of blue states is defensible and preferable to a divided nation; however, it is politically inconceivable due to the geographically mixed, deep polarization in our society.
External link The Newsweek Logo.

Newsweek December 30, 2024

How Will Donald Trump Change America in 2025?

Professor Sanford Levinson suggests that Donald Trump's rhetoric has spurred "normalization" of extremist ideas that will alter American political norms.
External link Newsweek logo

Newsweek December 3, 2024

Should U.S. Strip Presidents of Pardon Power?

Professor Sanford Levinson provides valuable historical insight into whether presidents should have the power to pardon, and offered the idea of  a new constitutional convention where issues related to the political structures could be debated.
External link Daily Texan Logo

The Daily Texan November 5, 2024

Democracy is on the ballot

Professor Sanford Levinson authored an opinion piece that explores the potential threats to democracy that could accompany a second Trump term.
External link Lawfare logo

Lawfare October 22, 2024

Chatter: Constitutional Fragility with Sandy Levinson

Professor Sanford Levinson is interviewed on Lawfare's Chatter podcast about the Constitution's fragility and how revisions may allow it to better manage gridlock, AI, and the potential of a contested election.
External link The New Yorker logo

The New Yorker September 24, 2024

Is It Time to Torch the Constitution?

Professor Sanford Levinson's 2006 book, “Our Undemocratic Constitution," is referenced in an opinion piece exploring the idea of a new constitutional convention.
External link Creators Syndicate logo

Creators Syndicate July 3, 2024

Time to save republic from Supreme Court

Professor Sanford Levinson was quoted regarding the Supreme Court's influence over the interpretation of the Constitution.