Paul R. Gugliuzza in the Media

Paul R. Gugliuzza’s faculty profile

External link PatentlyO logo

PatentlyO September 22, 2026

The Federal Circuit Expands Its Jurisdiction Yet Again

Professor Paul Gugliuzza authors a guest post arguing the Federal Circuit wrongfully answered the jurisdictional question in Insulet v. EOFlow by holding the trade secret case arose under patent law.
External link Daily Journal Logo

Daily Journal August 21, 2026

East Texas reclaims its patent crown

Professor Paul Gugliuzza says the Eastern District of Texas remains attractive to patent plaintiffs because of its experienced judges, fast schedules and trial-focused procedures, while defendants—particularly tech companies—have struggled to transfer cases out of the district.
External link Law360 logo

Law360 August 17, 2026

Medtech Group Faults Fed. Circ. Trade Secret Timing Rule

An amicus brief filed by Professor Paul Gugliuzza urging the full Federal Circuit to revisit a decision that wiped out Insulet Corporation's trade secret win against EOFlow Co. Ltd. is highlighted.
External link Yale Journal on Regulation

Yale Journal on Regulation August 10, 2026

Law, Discretion, and Psychedelics

Professor Paul Gugliuzza applies Judge Henry Friendly's landmark lecture on legal discretion to the Ninth Circuit's AIMS decision, examining how the DEA's broad authority can both block and accelerate patient access to investigational psychedelic therapies.
External link Bloomberg Law logo

Bloomberg Law July 22, 2026

A Cycling Icon Took on a Prolific Lawyer. The Dude Got Personal

In an article about a lawsuit against  a company owned by former cyclist Floyd Landis, Professor Paul Gugliuzza discusses the high-volume patent litigation model, noting that the potential profitability from a large number of small settlements.
External link Bloomberg Law logo

Bloomberg News June 4, 2026

Micron Battle Reveals Need for Clear Patent Jurisdiction Rules

Professor Paul Gugliuzza contends that, as state “anti-troll” statutes become more commonly used in patent disputes, courts need a jurisdictional rule that is clear and respects the difference between federal patent cases and state-law cases that simply have patents in them.